The NY Times Saturday had this article on Hillary's brilliant neutralization on the Iraq war question. It chronicles how she's become a supporter of the anti-war side gradually. Here's the crucial sentence: "Mrs. Clinton’s advisers suggested that she executed the shift with minimal political cost because there was no one moment in which she dramatically telegraphed a turn-around."
The lesson from 2004 was learned. Flip-flop without a defining moment (Kerry voting against war funding). Then you can't be called a flip-flopper, and yet it's very difficult to oppose you on the basis of past positions.
The war vote is obviously a festering sore on the Clinton campaign. But the strategy of avoiding defining moments is brilliant, because it does not refresh the memory of that vote. There's a limit to voter anger as time passes. It's just impossible to sustain anger if there's not a steady stream of reminders or smoking guns or defiance by the politician in the crosshairs. This was the Republican mistake in the 1998 midterm.
Democrats spy rare opening in rural America
1 week ago






No comments:
Post a Comment